|
Editor's
Introduction
Eugene E. García
Implementation of California's Proposition 227:
1998-2000
Proposition 227, known by its proponents as the "English
for the Children Initiative," passed by a 61% majority of California
voters on June 2, 1998. Although a range of motivations may have
contributed, the initiative was an example of "people making
law," written in response to apparent widespread discontent
with California's policies regarding the education of non-English-speaking
children in public schools. Its intent was to inject all English
instruction for these students in California's public schools. Some
25% of California's students currently fall into this student category
and are referred to as limited English proficient (LEP), English
language learners (ELL), and/or as language minority students. The
assumption behind the initiative was that teaching children in their
native language served only to hold them back in their acquisition
of English and therefore in their future educational success. A
parallel assumption was that learning English is the most important
in the education of these children.
|
|
In the Aftermath
of the Storm: English Learners in the Post-227 Era
Patricia Gándara
University of California, Davis
Abstract
In 1998, California passed a voter initiativeProposition
227that severely restricted the use of primary language for
instructional purposes, and instead provided a transitional program
of "structured English immersion" that was not normally
to last more than one year. Now more than two years after the passage
of Proposition 227, the pundits and the policymakers are anxiously
making pronouncements about its effects on California's English
learners. However, the numerous reform efforts underway in California,
and the limitations of existing data, make it impossible to draw
conclusions about the independent effects of the passage of Proposition
227 on the academic achievement of English learners. Contrary to
the political statements and shoot-from-the-hip analyses being touted
in the press, the achievement scores of California's English learners
yield little evidence of long term benefits for these students.
|
|
The Education
of Limited English Proficient Students in California Schools: An
Assessment of the Influence of Proposition 227 in Selected Districts
and Schools
Eugene E. García and Julia E. Curry-Rodríguez
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
Two separate but interrelated studies are reported
regarding the implementation of Proposition 227 in California. The
first "in-the-field" pilot study was conducted during
a period of eight months after the passage of Proposition 227 in
June 1998. The pilot study consisted of eight school districts selected
in 1998-99 from a statewide group involved addressing issues of
Proposition 227 implementation. The second study took place in 1999-2000.
The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding the
implementation of Proposition 227 a year after its passage from
a more representative sample of districts throughout the state.
|
|
Factors
Influencing Implementation of Mandated Policy Change: Proposition
227 in Seven Northern California School Districts
Julie Maxwell-Jolly
University of California, Davis
Abstract
Proposition 227 limits instructional use of students'
primary languages but allows bilingual programs if adequate numbers
of parents request an alternative to English-only instruction. Researchers
interviewed district and school personnel at seven sites to determine
influences on policy responses to Proposition 227 and observed the
impact of these policies on classroom practice. The history of support
for bilingual programs, disposition of district staff toward primary
language instruction, and community attitude and involvement, influenced
district policy. Researchers concluded that district decisions largely
determined school policy; policy responses varied to a surprising
extent; change occurred at all sites and was most evident in the
classroom; and Proposition 227 policy contributed to the existing
inconsistency in programs for English learners.
|
|
Informed
Parent Consent and Proposition 227
Augustine García
California State University, Bakersfield
Abstract
After the passage of Proposition 227 in California,
the State Department of Education issued specific regulations for
informing the parents of English language learners (ELLs) about
program options so that they could decide, as the new law permits,
whether to accept English language immersion or request a parent
exception waiver. This study was conducted among parents in three
geographically-distinct school districts which did their utmost
to inform them. The study compared the responses of parents who
requested waivers and bilingual education with those of parents
who did not request waivers. Parents were asked for their level
of agreement with factual statements on language acquisition/ development
and each program option (English language immersion, mainstream,
and bilingual education). They also responded to open-ended questions,
which were later categorized for analysis. The results clearly show
that the best informed parents in an atmosphere of complete disclosure
were those who chose a waiver and bilingual education.
|
|
Education
of Limited English Proficient Students in California Schools: An
Assessment of the Influence of Proposition 227 on Selected Teachers
and Classrooms
Tom Stritikus
University of Washington
and
Eugene E. García
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
This pilot study provides documentation on policy-and
practice-based questions regarding the implementation of Proposition
227 in eight selected but representative districts. Focusing on
teachers' reactions to Proposition 227, this study examines how
teachers both shape and are affected by Proposition 227 implementation.
Proposition 227 was intended to place a premium on English language
development in a highly uniform and prescriptive manner throughout
the state. Our initial study reveals that the nature of Proposition
227 implementation has a great deal to do with teacher ideology.
|
|
"English
for the Children": The New Literacy of the Old World
Order, Language Policy and Educational Reform
Kris D. Gutiérrez
University of California, Los Angeles
Patricia Baquedano-López
University of California, Berkeley
Jolynn Asato
University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
Proposition 227 is perhaps the single most important
language policy decision of this last centuryone that may
have profound consequences on schooling in the 21st century. Documenting
the ways school districts, the local schools, teachers, and parents
make sense of this new policy is central to understanding its short-
and long-term effects on the education of English language learners
(ELLs). Using qualitative approaches to inquiry, we have studied
how three different school districts in Southern California interpreted
and implemented the new law. A second concurrent strand of research
examined how teachers interpreted and implemented the new law in
classroom practice. Three case study classrooms were observed across
the first academic year implementing Proposition 227: (a) one English
immersion classroom, (b) one alternative bilingual classroom, and
(c) one structured immersion classroom. Participant observation
and interview methods were used to capture the evolution of classroom
practices, literacy practices in particular.
|
|
"I Used To Know That": What Happens
When Reform Gets Through The Classroom Door
Carol Dixon, Judith Green, Beth Yeager, and Doug Baker
University of California, Santa Barbara
María Fránquiz
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
This article places Proposition 227 in the context
of the policy web formed by a series of legislative acts and policies
at the national, state, and local school board levels; federal
judicial decisions; state and local elections; changes in the
local school district board and superintendent. We draw on our
ongoing ethnographic study of a fifth-grade classroom to illustrate
what happens when policies get through the classroom door. Through
this analysis, we illustrate how policies constrained the bilingual
teacher's ability to make learning opportunities available to
her linguistically diverse students in 1998-99.
|
|
Proposition 227: Tales from the Schoolhouse
Elsa Schirling, Frances Contreras, and Carlos Ayala
Stanford University
Abstract
This article explores the impact of Proposition 227
on students and teachers based on interviews with parents, teachers,
and administrators of a school in the Bay Area. We discuss four
themes that emerge from the data: parent involvement, academic impact
on students, the instructional challenges posed by Proposition 227,
and the emotional impact on teachers and students. Connecting these
themes is an overemphasis on language of instruction, which we found
to overshadow other issues critical to the education of language
minority students.
|
|
Inadequate Conclusions from an Inadequate Assessment:
What Can SAT-9 Scores Tell Us about the Impact of Proposition
227 in California?1
Yuko Goto Butler, Jennifer Evelyn Orr, Michele
Bousquet Gutiérrez, and Kenji Hakuta
Stanford University
Abstract
Proponents of Proposition 227 in California have
argued for the effectiveness of English-only instruction over
bilingual programs based on the increase in SAT-9 scores in the
years since its implementation. Based on analyses of SAT-9 scores
from 1998 to 2000, this article argues that: scores increased
for all students, not just for English-learning students; scores
increased for most districts regardless of the types of programs
implemented; increases could be attributed to a number of possible
factors, but it is not possible to separate out the impact of
Proposition 227; and SAT-9 is not an appropriate measure for assessing
English-learning students.
|
|
Reflections from the Classroom: Teacher
Perspectives on the Implementation of Proposition 227
Laura Alamillo and Celia Viramontes
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
This study provides a cross-sectional analysis of
77 teachers' perspectives on the second-year implementation of Proposition
227. The paper considers three instructional settings: (a) teachers
who continued teaching bilingual education, (b) teachers who switched
from bilingual education to structured English immersion, and (c)
teachers who remained in a structured English immersion or English-only
setting. Within these three scenarios, we identify four key areas
of concern related to the implementation of Proposition 227. This
study reveals that teacher response to and implementation of Proposition
227 was mediated by multiple factors including high stakes testing
and increased accountability.
|
|
Voices from the Field: Bilingual Educators
Speak Candidly About Proposition 227
Deborah K. Palmer and Eugene E. García
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
This paper presents findings from a mini-study on
the reactions of California bilingual educators to the implementation
of Proposition 227. Overall, the concerns of these educators are
consistent with those reported in other studies of educators throughout
California. Teachers worry about the erosion of primary language
programs, about the imposition of English-only standardized testing,
and about the lack of clear leadership on policy and practice
for language minority students. Administrators are concerned mainly
with issues of interpretation of the law, of accountability, and
of communication with parents and community. The authors conclude
that, not surprisingly, teachers and administrators continue to
be pragmatic, serving their students as best they can despite
adversity.
|
|
How Proposition 227 Influences the Language
Dynamics of a First- and Second-Grade Mathematics Lesson
Sara Micaela Paredes
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
This small scale study of a first/second-grade English
language development classroom describes the influence of Proposition
227 on the language practices and appropriation of content knowledge
among limited English proficient (LEP) students and their bilingual
teacher. Interviews and fieldnotes from the math lesson conducted
in English only were the sources of data used for the analysis and
findings. How the school districts' implementation of Proposition
227, which reduced native language instruction to only 20% of the
school day, influenced the teacher and her students on both an ideological
and practical level are described.
|
|
Book
Review One
The politics of multiculturalism and bilingual
education: Students and teachers caught in the cross fire.
By C. J. Ovando and P. McLaren
Reviewed by Kellie Rolstad
|
|
Book
Review Two
Chicano empowerment and bilingual education:
Movimiento politics in Crystal City, Texas.
By A. Trujillo
Reviewed by Angela Valenzuela
|
| |
|