Bilingual Research Journal
Winter and Spring 2000          Volume 24          Numbers 1 & 2

[NABE Home] [CBER Home] [Editors] [Submissions] [Feedback]
[Subscription] [Archives] [Contributors] [Table of Contents]


 

Editor's Introduction

Eugene E. García

Implementation of California's Proposition 227: 1998-2000

Proposition 227, known by its proponents as the "English for the Children Initiative," passed by a 61% majority of California voters on June 2, 1998. Although a range of motivations may have contributed, the initiative was an example of "people making law," written in response to apparent widespread discontent with California's policies regarding the education of non-English-speaking children in public schools. Its intent was to inject all English instruction for these students in California's public schools. Some 25% of California's students currently fall into this student category and are referred to as limited English proficient (LEP), English language learners (ELL), and/or as language minority students. The assumption behind the initiative was that teaching children in their native language served only to hold them back in their acquisition of English and therefore in their future educational success. A parallel assumption was that learning English is the most important in the education of these children.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

In the Aftermath of the Storm: English Learners in the Post-227 Era

Patricia Gándara
University of California, Davis

Abstract

In 1998, California passed a voter initiative—Proposition 227—that severely restricted the use of primary language for instructional purposes, and instead provided a transitional program of "structured English immersion" that was not normally to last more than one year. Now more than two years after the passage of Proposition 227, the pundits and the policymakers are anxiously making pronouncements about its effects on California's English learners. However, the numerous reform efforts underway in California, and the limitations of existing data, make it impossible to draw conclusions about the independent effects of the passage of Proposition 227 on the academic achievement of English learners. Contrary to the political statements and shoot-from-the-hip analyses being touted in the press, the achievement scores of California's English learners yield little evidence of long term benefits for these students.

 

Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

The Education of Limited English Proficient Students in California Schools: An Assessment of the Influence of Proposition 227 in Selected Districts and Schools

Eugene E. García and Julia E. Curry-Rodríguez
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Two separate but interrelated studies are reported regarding the implementation of Proposition 227 in California. The first "in-the-field" pilot study was conducted during a period of eight months after the passage of Proposition 227 in June 1998. The pilot study consisted of eight school districts selected in 1998-99 from a statewide group involved addressing issues of Proposition 227 implementation. The second study took place in 1999-2000. The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding the implementation of Proposition 227 a year after its passage from a more representative sample of districts throughout the state.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Factors Influencing Implementation of Mandated Policy Change: Proposition 227 in Seven Northern California School Districts

Julie Maxwell-Jolly
University of California, Davis

Abstract

Proposition 227 limits instructional use of students' primary languages but allows bilingual programs if adequate numbers of parents request an alternative to English-only instruction. Researchers interviewed district and school personnel at seven sites to determine influences on policy responses to Proposition 227 and observed the impact of these policies on classroom practice. The history of support for bilingual programs, disposition of district staff toward primary language instruction, and community attitude and involvement, influenced district policy. Researchers concluded that district decisions largely determined school policy; policy responses varied to a surprising extent; change occurred at all sites and was most evident in the classroom; and Proposition 227 policy contributed to the existing inconsistency in programs for English learners.


Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Informed Parent Consent and Proposition 227

Augustine García
California State University, Bakersfield

Abstract

After the passage of Proposition 227 in California, the State Department of Education issued specific regulations for informing the parents of English language learners (ELLs) about program options so that they could decide, as the new law permits, whether to accept English language immersion or request a parent exception waiver. This study was conducted among parents in three geographically-distinct school districts which did their utmost to inform them. The study compared the responses of parents who requested waivers and bilingual education with those of parents who did not request waivers. Parents were asked for their level of agreement with factual statements on language acquisition/ development and each program option (English language immersion, mainstream, and bilingual education). They also responded to open-ended questions, which were later categorized for analysis. The results clearly show that the best informed parents in an atmosphere of complete disclosure were those who chose a waiver and bilingual education.


Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Education of Limited English Proficient Students in California Schools: An Assessment of the Influence of Proposition 227 on Selected Teachers and Classrooms

Tom Stritikus
University of Washington

and

Eugene E. García
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

This pilot study provides documentation on policy-and practice-based questions regarding the implementation of Proposition 227 in eight selected but representative districts. Focusing on teachers' reactions to Proposition 227, this study examines how teachers both shape and are affected by Proposition 227 implementation. Proposition 227 was intended to place a premium on English language development in a highly uniform and prescriptive manner throughout the state. Our initial study reveals that the nature of Proposition 227 implementation has a great deal to do with teacher ideology.



Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

"English for the Children": The New Literacy of the Old World Order, Language Policy and Educational Reform

Kris D. Gutiérrez
University of California, Los Angeles

Patricia Baquedano-López
University of California, Berkeley

Jolynn Asato
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Proposition 227 is perhaps the single most important language policy decision of this last century—one that may have profound consequences on schooling in the 21st century. Documenting the ways school districts, the local schools, teachers, and parents make sense of this new policy is central to understanding its short- and long-term effects on the education of English language learners (ELLs). Using qualitative approaches to inquiry, we have studied how three different school districts in Southern California interpreted and implemented the new law. A second concurrent strand of research examined how teachers interpreted and implemented the new law in classroom practice. Three case study classrooms were observed across the first academic year implementing Proposition 227: (a) one English immersion classroom, (b) one alternative bilingual classroom, and (c) one structured immersion classroom. Participant observation and interview methods were used to capture the evolution of classroom practices, literacy practices in particular.


Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

"I Used To Know That": What Happens When Reform Gets Through The Classroom Door

Carol Dixon, Judith Green, Beth Yeager, and Doug Baker
University of California, Santa Barbara

María Fránquiz
University of Colorado, Boulder

Abstract

This article places Proposition 227 in the context of the policy web formed by a series of legislative acts and policies at the national, state, and local school board levels; federal judicial decisions; state and local elections; changes in the local school district board and superintendent. We draw on our ongoing ethnographic study of a fifth-grade classroom to illustrate what happens when policies get through the classroom door. Through this analysis, we illustrate how policies constrained the bilingual teacher's ability to make learning opportunities available to her linguistically diverse students in 1998-99.


Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Proposition 227: Tales from the Schoolhouse

Elsa Schirling, Frances Contreras, and Carlos Ayala
Stanford University

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Proposition 227 on students and teachers based on interviews with parents, teachers, and administrators of a school in the Bay Area. We discuss four themes that emerge from the data: parent involvement, academic impact on students, the instructional challenges posed by Proposition 227, and the emotional impact on teachers and students. Connecting these themes is an overemphasis on language of instruction, which we found to overshadow other issues critical to the education of language minority students.

 

Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Inadequate Conclusions from an Inadequate Assessment: What Can SAT-9 Scores Tell Us about the Impact of Proposition 227 in California?1

Yuko Goto Butler, Jennifer Evelyn Orr, Michele Bousquet Gutiérrez, and Kenji Hakuta
Stanford University

Abstract

Proponents of Proposition 227 in California have argued for the effectiveness of English-only instruction over bilingual programs based on the increase in SAT-9 scores in the years since its implementation. Based on analyses of SAT-9 scores from 1998 to 2000, this article argues that: scores increased for all students, not just for English-learning students; scores increased for most districts regardless of the types of programs implemented; increases could be attributed to a number of possible factors, but it is not possible to separate out the impact of Proposition 227; and SAT-9 is not an appropriate measure for assessing English-learning students.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

 

Reflections from the Classroom: Teacher Perspectives on the Implementation of Proposition 227

Laura Alamillo and Celia Viramontes
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

This study provides a cross-sectional analysis of 77 teachers' perspectives on the second-year implementation of Proposition 227. The paper considers three instructional settings: (a) teachers who continued teaching bilingual education, (b) teachers who switched from bilingual education to structured English immersion, and (c) teachers who remained in a structured English immersion or English-only setting. Within these three scenarios, we identify four key areas of concern related to the implementation of Proposition 227. This study reveals that teacher response to and implementation of Proposition 227 was mediated by multiple factors including high stakes testing and increased accountability.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Voices from the Field: Bilingual Educators Speak Candidly About Proposition 227

Deborah K. Palmer and Eugene E. García
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a mini-study on the reactions of California bilingual educators to the implementation of Proposition 227. Overall, the concerns of these educators are consistent with those reported in other studies of educators throughout California. Teachers worry about the erosion of primary language programs, about the imposition of English-only standardized testing, and about the lack of clear leadership on policy and practice for language minority students. Administrators are concerned mainly with issues of interpretation of the law, of accountability, and of communication with parents and community. The authors conclude that, not surprisingly, teachers and administrators continue to be pragmatic, serving their students as best they can despite adversity.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

How Proposition 227 Influences the Language Dynamics of a First- and Second-Grade Mathematics Lesson

Sara Micaela Paredes
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

This small scale study of a first/second-grade English language development classroom describes the influence of Proposition 227 on the language practices and appropriation of content knowledge among limited English proficient (LEP) students and their bilingual teacher. Interviews and fieldnotes from the math lesson conducted in English only were the sources of data used for the analysis and findings. How the school districts' implementation of Proposition 227, which reduced native language instruction to only 20% of the school day, influenced the teacher and her students on both an ideological and practical level are described.

 
Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Book Review One

The politics of multiculturalism and bilingual education: Students and teachers caught in the cross fire.
By C. J. Ovando and P. McLaren

Reviewed by Kellie Rolstad

Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents

 

Book Review Two

Chicano empowerment and bilingual education: Movimiento politics in Crystal City, Texas.
By A. Trujillo

Reviewed by Angela Valenzuela

Full Text in PDF
Table of Contents
 

 

[NABE Home] [CBER Home] [Editors] [Submissions] [Feedback]
[Subscription] [Archives] [Contributors] [Table of Contents]